May 2012 – Episode 23
James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20)
James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20)
Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23)
Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11)
Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19)
Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12)
Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22)
Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”.
Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24)
Christopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice book. (Length: 15:13)
DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24)
Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37)