Episode 43 — November 2016
Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25)
Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25)
Jeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22)
Philip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets”
Philip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe”
Marco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50)
Bruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23)
William Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32)
Elliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49)
Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05)
Katharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37)